Kestrel Talon
85/100
BikeRide Score
?
Where to buy
If this bike is out of stock, take a look at our other highly rated bikes.
We earn affiliate commission.
Learn more
Facts
Release Year
Brand
Wheel Size
Number of Gears
Gearing Type
Weight
18.0 lb
Suspension
Brake Type
Frame Material
Summary of Reviews
We have read all expert and user reviews on the Kestrel Talon. In summary, this is what cyclists think.
15 reasons to buy
- The Talon’s climbing abilities were regularly given high praise.
- Buyers expressed satisfaction with the price of the Talon, especially as a full-carbon bike and with Shimano 105 kit.
- It’s a fairly light steed. Depending on build, a Talon comes in at anywhere from 16 to 21 pounds.
- Some owners saw the construction of the carbon frame as being of high quality.
- At least one owner was delighted to receive tools and an owner manual with their Kestrel.
- Handling was apparently responsive and stable. This bike cornered well and showed precision on descents.
- The ride quality of the Talon was deemed to be smooth and steady.
- Componentry was lauded on Shimano 105 groupsets, Ultegra kit and SRAM setups.
- No doubt that many owners loved the ‘tremendous sex appeal’ of the Talon, with it’s aero tubing, internal cabling and ‘sleek, clean’ lines.
- The carbon frame exhibited shock-absorbence, lateral stiffness and minimal flex. It was described as being tight but forgiving.
- Through efficient energy-transfer of pedal-power, acceleration was impressive.
- A widely adjustable and reversible seatpost, allows the Talon to be set up as a standard road bike – or as an aggressive triathlon beast.
- It was common to hear from owners who coveted having a distinctive and less common bike.
- Larger riders (up to 250 lbs), regarded the Talon as very sturdy, even bombproof.
- After long-term comparison with other bikes, one expert felt that the Talon was superior in its handling of descents.
8 reasons not to buy
- While cables are routed internally, there are no guides for them. This made rerouting difficult.
- Stability was affected when the bike was set up in the steep triathlon position.
- Some riders felt that the Talon was not suited to frequent endurance rides.
- After 2000 miles, some microcracks appeared in framework. There are a few reports of frame failure.
- A few owners called the Talon ‘flashy’ and ‘ugly’, with accusations that it exuded a ‘cheap feel’.
- Seatpost-slip was a frequent complaint, with one mechanic saying this was due to microcracks in the carbon frame. The aero design was difficult to mount in the clamp of a standard repair stand.
- Occasionally the Talon was criticized as being too stiff, with a hard and unforgiving rear-end.
- One buyer was dismayed at a limited choice of colors.
Bottom line
With its highly adjustable saddle position and seatpost, Kestrel intends riders to be able to move from an aggressive Triathlon position to a more relaxed road racing stance. Due to this, the Talon has been accused of attempting to be ‘all things to all people’. In truth, owners report racing this bike in amateur road, triathlon and time-trial races, with success. While it may not be thoroughbred enough for pros and purists, the Talon has received a great deal of praise, even after long-term use. As it’s sold direct, the modest price suggests this may be a good first carbon bike for those without bottomless pockets.Expert Reviews
0/100 based on 0 rated expert reviewsKestrel Talon with Shimano 105 – Spec Rundown & Review
Kestrel Talon TSR 1.0 Long Term Review
Testbericht: Kestrel Talon SL
Im Test: Neun aerodynamisch optimierte Rennräder (In the Test: Nine Aerodynamically Optimized Racing Bikes)
Fahrräder im Vergleich: Frische Flitzer (Bicycles in Comparison: Fresh Speedsters)
Fahrräder im Vergleich: Stark im Wind (Bicycles in Comparison: Strong in the Wind)
Best Road Bikes
Road bikes with the highest BikeRide Scores
?
Bike Comparison
Kestrel Talon in comparison to averages
Forum Discussions
Discuss which bike to choose in the forum
-
4 hours ago
-
7 hours ago
-
15 hours ago